![]() By June, even Barnes & Noble’s Nook Color tablet was responsible for more Web traffic than the Kindle Fire. We don’t necessarily doubt it, but not citing the source is outside of the realm of standard practices.Īt the same time, it’s already understood that sales of the device were frontloaded in the first quarter of availability, and that sales plummeted once customers got them in their hands and then put them back down again on a shelf somewhere. For one thing, Amazon didn’t cite its source, making it impossible to know how that number was derived. tablet market in “just nine months,” which is, again, a curious way to put things. Speaking of which, an image of a Kindle Fire 2 was “leaked” to The Verge (below) on Thursday-no doubt it’s a coincidence.Ĭredit: The Verge (reprinted with permission)Īmazon claimed that Kindle Fire captured 22 percent of the U.S. That’s a curious term unless Amazon intended the device to have a limited run, but we can presume that it means Amazon won’t make any more as it transitions to an expected Kindle Fire 2 update. Amazon told the world on Thursday that its budget tablet entry, Kindle Fire, has sold out.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |